The original post for this topic is located here.
We continue with our reviews of the EPA’s proposed updates to its Risk Management Program. This is the sixth post in this series. Earlier posts are indexed here. The proposed change discussed in this post is to do with audits. (All comments refer to Scope 3 requirements.)
We have completed our review of the 24 proposed updates to the OSHA process safety management standard. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is going through a similar update process with regard to their Risk Management Program rule. The OSHA and EPA updates are similar in many respects, but there are also significant differences.
This link takes you to the latest index.
This video and accompanying transcript shows how process safety professionals can make a contribution toward addressing the climate crisis.
“The past is where you learned the lesson. The future is where you apply the lesson. Don’t give up in the middle!” Dale Carnegie, American writer and lecturer.
Did you know that from the perspective of an investor, it is the Commissioning & Start-Up (CSU) phase that defines the project as a success or failure? When a project has been fully commissioned and started-up, it is likely the project will also be a financial success, with investors receiving their expected returns. When a project has not been fully commissioned and is then started-up, it is highly unlikely the project could ever be a financial success. From an investor's perspective, the project is a disaster.
This post is the third in a series to do with scenario analysis and the proposed SEC Climate-disclosure rule.
© 2017-2025 Ian Sutton Technical Books & Modules | All rights reserved
Proudly built in Richmond, VA by Garza Web Design